Conversations With Myself

a) I use a chain of reasoning and conclusive arguments to prove points of philosophical, speculative, and opinionated subject matter.  What kind of a person am I?

b) Why shouldn't philosophy be supported by reason?  Why can't matters of faith be argued reasonably?

a) Reason defeats the purpose of faith.  If matters of faith can be proved then it's not faith.

b) Faith is supported by a different kind of reason.  People who have faith in something aren't crazy, they just use their own form of reasoning to draw conclusions which perhaps can't be proved chemically.

c) You think too much.